As has been said, Canada and CAMR are not the only solution to all of these problems. Canada needs to be a player, and Canada has taken a leadership role. There's a lot of mobilization. We've seen all the grandmothers who are here today; we've seen a number of other political actors who have come forward to say that this is a priority; we've seen two hearings in the last week on this, as well as a number of hearings that have taken place before. There is a lot of momentum here that does not exist in other countries.
Canada is in a position to really take on a leadership role, demonstrate what can be done, demonstrate what the most effective language would look like in a paragraph 6 decision or an August 30 decision that could work. There is a critical need, and an increasingly critical need, as India's generic market is under threat because of TRIPS, as all least-developed countries are going to need to implement a TRIPS-compliant intellectual property regime within the next five years.
So Canada is in a position to take a very strong leadership role. It's not the only solution, and other countries hopefully would come forward as well. But there is a real need, and Canada can be a real player in this.
I hope that answers your question.