They were very quick to respond to the first request for a voluntary licence, which was made quite early in 2005, with a 14-page lawyer's letter back for all the reasons why the companies were not able to accept, to issue a voluntary licence at that moment. Those actual negotiations are behind-the-door negotiations. I was not privy to those negotiations, but they went on for an extremely long period.
After the 68-day period, which I don't actually think is reflecting the true period of the negotiations, what happened then was that Rwanda went through its own systems of having to make a public tender in order to get different quotes from different companies. Apotex's was one of the quotes in there, and many of the delays were on that level.
This is a country's sovereign right to do the tenders process in the right way, which goes to prove that Apotex's activity was absolutely not a stunt, and I take great offence to that comment. This was a genuine effort to get drugs out to people. The reason why it could not be better was because of the restrictions--