Right. I guess the way we would think about the issue is that the regime in CAMR is not enforced by the government; it's meant to be enforced by rights holders. So the transparency requirements--for example, some of the things that are dealt with in section 21.16 of the Patent Act and that clause 13 would amend--are meant to assist that private enforcement of the regime. If there's no transparency about the name of the country or the particulars of the authorized product for export, it's very difficult to then enforce those requirements should they not be respected.
On November 1st, 2010. See this statement in context.