Evidence of meeting #42 for Industry, Science and Technology in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was c-393.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Mike MacPherson  Procedural Clerk
Colette Downie  Director General, Marketplace Framework Policy Branch, Department of Industry
Mona Frendo  Director, Patent and Trade-mark Policy Directorate, Department of Industry
Rob Sutherland-Brown  Senior Counsel, Legal Services, Justice Canada, Department of Industry
Mark Mahabir  Committee Researcher

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Thank you, Mr. Lake.

Do we have any other debate or comments?

We'll move to the clause itself. Shall clause 3 carry as amended? All in favour? Opposed?

(Clause 3 as amended agreed to)

We'll now go to clause 4, which has three amendments: Liberal-1.5, Liberal-1.6, and Liberal-2. That's where we left off our debate the last time: at Liberal-2.

Mr. Garneau, I'll let you move them and speak to them as well, Lib-1.5 and Lib 1.6, to give us an understanding of that, and then Mr. Malo--

Oh, go ahead, Mr. Malo. Sorry, Mr. Garneau.

10:40 a.m.

Bloc

Luc Malo Bloc Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC

Thank you very much.

I would like to apply the same logic we used when looking at amendments LIB-1 to LIB-6. Before we consider amendments LIB-2 and LIB-3, would it not be possible to finish with amendment LIB-4? We have already adopted amendment LIB-4, but amendment LIB-4.1 was added to the book. We need to deal with that part before moving on to amendment LIB-2.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

You're speaking of amendment Lib-4.1 in clause 13. Is that correct?

10:40 a.m.

Bloc

Luc Malo Bloc Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC

Yes, because we have already adopted amendments LIB-4, LIB-5 and LIB-6. We just need to finish with that section. Then we can come back to amendments LIB-2 and LIB-3.

I imagine it will not take too long to adopt the amendment.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Is everybody agreed we'll move to Lib-4.1, then, in clause 13?

10:40 a.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

(On clause 13)

I'm sorry, Mr. Garneau. I won't need you to speak to those others, but if you'd speak to amendment Lib-4.1, that would be great. Consider it moved as you speak to it.

10:40 a.m.

Liberal

Marc Garneau Liberal Westmount—Ville-Marie, QC

That's Lib-4.1?

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

In clause 13, that's correct.

10:40 a.m.

Liberal

Marc Garneau Liberal Westmount—Ville-Marie, QC

Yes, Mr. Chair.

This amendment is an amendment to clause 13 of Bill C-393. It's to restore the existing paragraph 21.16(1)(a) because it's connected to the restoration of the existing application process in accordance with amendment Lib-2, which deleted, as you know, subclause 4(2). That's essentially what it is. It's related to clause 4, but it is in clause 13.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Thank you, Mr. Garneau.

Mr. Malo, did you have some comments on it, since you directed us here?

10:40 a.m.

Bloc

Luc Malo Bloc Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC

Unless I am mistaken, Liberal amendment LIB 4-1, which seeks to amend clause 13, refers to clause 4, which we have just adopted. Is that correct?

10:40 a.m.

An hon. member

We did not adopt clause 4.

10:40 a.m.

Bloc

Luc Malo Bloc Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC

We did not adopt clause 4?

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

No, we didn't. No, we haven't.

10:40 a.m.

Bloc

Luc Malo Bloc Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC

Oh, okay then. So we just adopted clause 3.

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Yes, we just adopted clause 3, Mr. Malo. We have not moved on to clause 4, which has three different amendments: Lib-1.5, Lib-1.6, and Lib-2.

10:45 a.m.

Bloc

Luc Malo Bloc Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC

Fine. We need to come back to amendment LIB-1.5 then.

I apologize, Mr. Chair.

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Okay. The amendment has been moved on clause 13 now, so rather than go back and forth, we'll finish this debate and then go back. Is that okay?

10:45 a.m.

Bloc

Luc Malo Bloc Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC

It is just that I thought....

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Mr. Masse.

10:45 a.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

Mr. Chair, on a point of clarification, which clause is tied to amendment Lib-4.1? Are we going back to—

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Right now we are directed to clause 13 and amendment Lib-4.1. I think there was an issue with the numbering and Mr. Malo was confused on that.

10:45 a.m.

Bloc

Luc Malo Bloc Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC

Mr. Chair, I thought that the Liberals' amendment.... I should have asked the question before asking that we discuss it. I thought the clause that amendment LIB-4.1 seeks to amend was directly related to the adoption of amendment LIB-4, which refers to clause 12. I was just wondering why it had been numbered as LIB-4.1. I was under the impression that it was amending clause 12, as well.

My mistake. I apologize.

10:45 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Mr. Masse, then Mr. Garneau.