Thank you.
I have a question for Mr. Rienzo, if you don't mind.
In looking at this and based on a lot of the calls I've had on this bill, it seems that former Nortel employees who are watching this bill with the hopes that.... They were almost led to believe that this was going to be the messiah that was going to put their pensions back in place. In reading it, you realize—in my interpretation, and I guess some of the legal interpretation that came forward—that it only affects pensions from restructuring to bankruptcy.
As you mentioned earlier, that could be a very short period, based on the legislation that comes forward. It's an oversight, obviously, of those who put this together.
How would you fix this, or what would you propose to avoid the problem of going from restructuring to bankruptcy in a quick mode? Really, there is a very short series of payments.
You mentioned that the whole amount of the capital would be frozen. But the interpretation I have looked at said it would just be the payments that are made within that period, which still do not constitute a great amount. It doesn't help the Nortel people at all and it doesn't help anyone going into a bankruptcy with a pension.