I just wanted to add that the earlier conversation was talking about the other countries, 30 countries and so on. You have to be very careful in looking at those studies to decide whether what's covered is what is in arrears—in other words, the special payments that should have been made in accordance with the Pension Benefits Standards Act by the time the company went under—or the full deficit. I think, if you look through the entire list of countries, there are precious few that actually put the whole deficit ahead of the bond-holders, rather than just the special payments in arrears.
You also have to look at the maturity of the pension system in those countries. You need to look at ones where the pension assets are a very large proportion of total corporate assets, and we come down to there being virtually no other examples.