There was a discussion among House leaders about my motion of instruction that I put forward. What I wanted to do in that motion was to open up another article, the BIA, which would have allowed us to at least consider amendments that would remove the major portion of this bill--the pensions from secured into preferred. We needed permission to do that because that in fact did change the scope of the bill. I'm sure that would have been ruled out of order, which is why we put the motion forward.
On November 25th, 2010. See this statement in context.