I just want to get some clarification. In terms of Mr. Rafferty's motion, I don't think it was actually ever raised in the House, so there was never any unanimous consent denied or anything like that, to my recollection.
Mr. Garneau wants to have more time to have the witnesses come before us. I just want to know what the idea is. Will we have all of the same witnesses who have been before the committee and just redo the last three days of meetings? Is that the proposal?