It's an interesting trade-off, because the assets would have been liquidated. In other words, they would have been sold. As I said, only 60%, or maybe 70%, of the assets could have been sold, and yes, if the bill were in place, the pension would have been fully funded. However, 30% to 40% of our employees, while they would have kept their pensions, wouldn't have a job in La Sarre, Quebec, or Témiscaming, Quebec, or Kapuskasing, Ontario, or in a lot of our high-risk operations that were going through difficult times.
To us, we need to have a scenario in which we protect the employees in their jobs and protect the pensions at the same time. The bill forces a choice of either protecting the pensions or protecting the employees in the entire company.