The position of the government is that there has been no change in the application of the control in fact test. The test has been laid out in jurisprudence, and the leading jurisprudence is the Canadian Airlines case that was decided by the Federal Court of Appeal in 1993.
Maybe I can put it in these terms: the challenge in applying the control in fact test is that it's essentially that. One has to look at all the facts and determine whether those facts taken together amount to control. It's not legal control but factual control. That's not an exact science; it's a subjective assessment of the facts. The law has not changed. The application of the law has not changed. That's what the government has decided in the Globalive decision.