Again, to comment, we don't have to have a meeting with witnesses, other than the officials next week, if we were going to have these concurrent meetings on the CRTC and the ICA that the opposition parties seem to want. We're willing to have concurrent meetings in the interest of compromise, but if the Investment Canada Act is a priority, certainly we can hear from officials next week in the one meeting that's scheduled for the Investment Canada Act. It would be two weeks before we would have anybody else come before the committee.
Again, if it's a priority, if it's as Chris Charlton said, a debate that is long overdue in this country, then certainly that would seem to make sense: that we would move forward and have officials on, say, Tuesday next week on the Investment Canada Act, and then on the following Tuesday, two weeks from today, we would have our first set of witnesses. If the witnesses Mr. Masse wants can't come two weeks from now, then the next meeting we would be having would be four weeks from now. I'm certain they would be able to come by then.