If I may, I will answer in French. To some extent, heavy users may cause some congestion in a network, and ultimately it is the direct supplier that has to deal with that.
If there is congestion, if the heavy users all decide to put excessive demand on the Internet at the same second, Oricom's pipeline to the Internet via Bell will be blocked. Oricom's customers are the ones that will suffer the effects of the congestion. Not Bell's customers. That is what has to be understood. Our company rents a pipeline of a certain size. We pay the wholesale price to Bell every month to rent that pipeline. If, for example, we have 2,000 more customers and we forget to call the supplier, which is Bell, to tell them to enlarge the pipeline, there will be congestion. That's our problem, we handle it and we bill our customers accordingly, based on various marketing strategy models available to us. It isn't Bell's problem. If Bell wanted to deliver its IP television on the same pipeline, for example, there might be congestion. It isn't caused by Oricom's customers. It's a different problem. I would say the engineers are very good in general at finding bypasses for problems. But if our customers create congestion, we are the ones they are going to complain to, no one else, and we will have to handle the problem, and solve it and invest in a more robust network. It is no more complicated than that.
To conclude, we can certainly compete with Bell in some areas with packages it doesn't offer. Doctors, for example, need a lot of bandwidth for some applications. We are going to put together a special package for them, one that seems a little disadvantageous for other customer groups, but it is what enables us to exist, to differentiate ourselves.