If I understood the question correctly, I think the government did not decree deregulation. I wasn't there, and, frankly, I'm not an expert in the area, but I think what the government did try to do was to create a framework that tries to adhere to free markets as much as possible. But of course we've seen very clearly from what happened in 2008 that nobody is really an advocate of having a completely unrestrained free market. The world economy nearly crashed because of this unrestrained free market.
I think what we have to do is expect our regulators to have some degree of judgment when it comes to interpreting general objectives like that, so that you can come up with a result where you don't have hundreds and hundreds of thousands of Canadians up in arms over the fact that they're being gouged and paying for something that has no value. I'm not sure where the fault lies, but I'm really not sure that the seeds of it are in that particular piece of paper.