There are two courses. One is revoke the policy direction. There have been a number of decisions on social measures that we find very anti-consumer-protective, and also have not come through on the competition side. The other way of doing it is to clarify--again--what it means, and the interpretation, unfortunately, that seems to have come out of the policy direction is that there has to be this competitive neutrality.
The way I read the policy direction, that's wrong. When we're talking about economic measures, there doesn't have to be any symmetry between cable and telephone. There only has to be efficient entry of competitors and no extra support of competitors where their entry would be inefficient.
So we're going to go back in this next 60 days and make these arguments about the policy direction to CRTC. But if they don't accept it, there are some courses open. The government could go through section 8 and modify this thing again, or it could just take a look at it and say it was a mistake, the CRTC can't handle this responsibility.