As I've indicated before, there are only six factors under the act. Those are the factors that are considered part of the review process.
That being said, on your point about non-compliance, to the extent—and I'm not talking case-specific—that an investor had a number of plans that were supplemented by undertakings and ultimately received approval to proceed with the transaction, and they then exhibit behaviour after a certain period of time while those undertakings are still valid such that they are non-compliant with one of those undertakings, sections 39 and 40 kick in.
If they exhibit a behaviour that happens to be totally outside the plans or undertakings that were part of the transaction, then the ability of the minister to trigger section 39 or section 40 might be limited. To the extent that what happens was very much goes against the plans and the undertakings that were provided to the minister, the act provides, under sections 39 and 40, for the minister to take enforcement action.
As for the average time of review, Richard, can you address that?