Here is my final question. I want to respond to a question from my colleague across the way. He said that this is almost arbitrary in terms of the minister's ability. They must forget that they were—I've forgotten about it already—in power for 13 years and before that, when this act was in place, and I don't think they turned down any of the reviews.
Would you consider the advice and the position of the cabinet minister, whether it's a man or a woman, an arbitrary decision-making process? Or is there a process for them that's followed in a plan, in a regular way, so that we have consistent decisions made over time?