Excuse me, Brian, but I don't think I put myself in that position. We as a department made a factual decision that Globalive was as Canadian as it needed to be under the Telecommunications Act. CRTC disagreed. We are in court because this has been taken to court by one of the other players. It's their right to do that. But it doesn't change our motivation. We have legal reasons to think we're right about the court case. I won't bore you with those details. But behind the legal reasons, there's also the public policy—more competition, new entrants, the idea that people have choices in their wireless, the idea that people are not beholden to a duopoly or an oligopoly. I thought you and I might be agreeing on that, actually.
Evidence of meeting #59 for Industry, Science and Technology in the 40th Parliament, 3rd session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was crtc.
A recording is available from Parliament.