There's been a lot of talk about the 2006 policy direction. Opposition members have talked about it a lot. I wonder as I read it, though, if they've ever actually read the policy direction, because it talks significantly about the market; it talks significantly about competition and competitive neutrality. As you mentioned, it instructed the CRTC to rely on market forces to the maximum extent feasible, and when using regulatory measures, to ensure technological and competitive neutrality where possible, to enable competition from new technologies, and not to artificially favour either incumbents or independent ISPs.
Maybe you can expand on that a little bit. It seems to me that when I read that, this decision does not meet those criteria.