Thank you, Mr. Chair. I will share my time with Mr. Bouchard.
According to Mr. Lake, the 2006 Bernier decision is not supposed to favour certain independent or incumbent companies over others. However, Order in Council P.C. 2009-2007—I am getting back to what I was I talking about earlier—urges the CRTC, in different terms, to ensure that its decisions are not detrimental to Bell's IP Television. This is not a neutral position. The CRTC decision on speed matching ensured the survival of ISPs and thereby protected competition. Order in Council 2009-2007 asks that the decision be reviewed in Bell's favour. Why?