I'm not privy to all the proceedings of that relationship and review. But I do know that in the case of Rio Tinto certain undertakings were made, certain commitments, and those commitments were not fulfilled, it would seem.
They made commitments to capital spending, which they did not uphold. On the major upgrades in their plants in Saguenay and in Kitimat in B.C., those capital investments weren't made. They closed the plant in Beauharnois. They reduced production in Vaudreuil. They cut head office jobs by almost 20%. I think it was 1,100 jobs in all. That's the estimate of the jobs loss.
It seems to me that under the act, if you're going to have criteria for measuring net benefit, you have to be able to monitor and you have to be able to enforce. That enforcement should include sanctions up to and including revoking the transaction, the takeover.