That's very thorough. Thank you, Mr. Goldman.
I know that you, Mr. Goldman, and Mr. Borgers and Mr. Baldanza have all had extensive experience in competition law, and I wonder whether you would advocate or consider—not necessarily advocate—guidelines very similar to what you have in the Competition Act. I realize that all transactions are not one-size-fits-all, but at least to provide against or repel the perception of decisions based on whim, might that be considered a second step? We already have, if you will, some background, some understanding of how those kinds of transactions take place on a domestic basis. Could we transpose that to have an effect when it comes to ministerial decisions?
We understand there are limits in terms of security. We've seen this in the past in terms of certain jurisprudence. I think we all understand the importance of keeping information in such a way that it does not harm the parties that are there, offering—as the Canadian Bar Association has suggested—that advice be given or concerns be raised with the potential investor, but I'm wondering if there is a more precise way of doing this—in other words, perhaps an issue of reciprocity. What are the international best practices in this area? Have we gone beyond simply the question of saying we'll have a little bit of transparency? Are guidelines a possibility, are international best practices a possibility, and what about the implications of reciprocity?
Mr. Borgers, I'd love to hear from you.