I'll take the example of the potash deal, which I've spent some time thinking about. It was an opportunity to bring capital into the country. It may turn out, as it does in so many deals, that the capital comes anyway, because BHP is still considering the Jansen Lake mine and the $12 billion investment.
I think it's very important to note that if you looked at the analysis up to 2030 of that potential takeover, you would find that there would have been more than 1,000 jobs created in the Jansen Lake mine for the building of it and in connection with all the ancillary infrastructure required for a big mine. Then there would have been a large number of jobs in the mine and then direct and indirect and induced effects on the economy.
So you can actually get, in the case of a resource, depending on what the resource is and how it's used, very substantial investment in jobs and communities out of it with foreign capital coming in--depending on the resources.
In the case of potash, it can't be stored out of the ground for long periods of time, and the market for it is international.