I can give you some examples of branch plants in Canada that are world leaders in their area. Some of our biggest R and D operations are foreign-owned enterprises. If you go to Xerox or IBM you'll see major investment, and in some of the pharmaceutical firms that are foreign-owned as well.
I don't connect the two parts, but if you want to come back to the first part of your comment about the impacts of a takeover, it is a legitimate point to require investors to meet certain conditions that are in the public interest, if they're transparently in the public interest and the representatives of the public have announced them and people understand what the circumstances are so there's a level playing field.
I have to tell you that we've been doing some work. I have a recent report that we've done on headquarters in Canada, looking at their impact on employment among other things. I do not see any evidence of this decline in jobs coming out of the changes. Toronto doesn't seem to be suffering in any particular way, for example. One has to be careful about making associations between outcomes in one place and another.
That being said, I do think it is a legitimate role for government to have a look at this and to set out and say it wants to explore this and there is some evidence there and there is a basis for setting some rules out, but let's make them clear and consistent and apply them across the board.