Thank you, Mr. Chair.
This is the whole point, though, that we don't know, so really what we have is a $685-million crapshoot, because we don't know, if we can't nail down exactly what the reliability is going to be, how valuable the data will be or if it is even going to stand the test of time.
I'd like to ask the panel members to put aside for the moment the national survey versus the veracity of a real census. How important is it for the stability of this data for other types of research? I think that's one of the things that gets lost the usage of the material coming out and how it can actually be used for other scientific research.