Seeing that you're actually supporting the Conservative budget anyway, it's easy to have that confusion....
Well, whether you're supporting or not supporting it, I don't know; it depends.
At any rate, I think one of the interesting things that has happened, and you hear it here today, is that Canadians are supposed to celebrate the fact that Canadian companies are getting record tax cuts right now. The government's position on this is, “Well, yes, we should allow foreign ownership to happen here, it's okay.” The way to rebuff the argument is to say that Canadian companies are investing abroad.
So we're supposed to celebrate that Canadian companies are deciding to invest overseas and into other foreign markets as opposed to Canadian companies and Canadian jobs. It doesn't do me any good in Windsor West, where we have an official unemployment rate of 15%, probably about 25% in total. We're supposed to be happy with the government's position to say it's terrific because Canadian companies are investing in Asia, Europe, and anywhere else—the southeast, and even in Michigan—and not in Ontario and elsewhere.
There's one thing I'm really interested in hearing a comment on. Right now there are no limitations on foreign investment; it's controlling shares. I agree with some of the discussion that has taken place here with regard to the content. I want to hear a little bit more, though, about the integration of the industry between the Internet, television, and even the airwaves. One of the things we've seen is this convergence, which is not dissimilar to other areas. Look at the oil and gas sector. You don't need to have collusion, because there's no competition due to the vertical integration of the industry. And that's what I'm concerned about.
I saw Mr. Wallace joke about how fewer reporters on the Hill would be a good thing. At the same time, though, we would--