I am aware that we invest more than they do here. I'm aware of that. I would venture to say, though, specifically we're talking about some very key industries here; I'll mention that later on. These are different industries. This is not a furniture company. This is essential to our national identity and to our national strategy, to our security. So there is a difference in the companies. We would want to protect this more than perhaps any other.
The other thing is that, yes, Canadians could benefit from a patent that was done in California. Our concern now is that in this particular industry, there is a kind of whimsy, if you will, on the part of the owner of that patent who can say either that he will allow you to benefit from it or he will not. And in this industry, which is very key and certainly in the past 10 or 20 years the fastest-growing industry, you would see that it could become a matter of national security.
Our concern would be that somebody would say, yes, we invented that in Orillia, but you know what? It's going to stay here in Wisconsin.
So the patent-holders have the ability to make that decision--as we would, you're absolutely right--but because these industries are so key, we say leave them alone from that kind of whimsy.