But dividing into two rounds is not even a rational way to approach it. That's just a thing we've invented. The meeting goes on. There are not two meetings. The meeting doesn't stop and then restart again. And that's what the proposal is, that all of a sudden we'll get to a certain point because everybody has gotten through.
I like the suggestion of making sure everybody participates. I thought that was a valued thing that was added before. But the meeting doesn't stop with 15 minutes to go. It's a continuum.
To me, the second round is something we invent. It's not something that's real. The meeting is a continuum. That's why I'm suggesting it becomes an anomaly in a meeting in terms of the pattern. And it does become important, because at that point in time, if we do have some time.... The clock is ticking. Then perhaps we should reduce the.... I don't know; that won't work either. I just think it's more balanced if we continue with the pattern that's happening. It's fair. It will then, as well, allow Liberals, if there is extra time, to get a little bit of a spot at the end.