If we're actually going to accomplish anything as a subcommittee, it makes sense for us to have the same majority as on the committee and in the House. Otherwise, there's no point in having a subcommittee.
As Mr. Sweet mentioned, we didn't actually use the subcommittee last time, because it was a pointless exercise. We were going to come back to the committee and hash out the same battles. But this time it's a little bit of a different circumstance. I think the subcommittee should be able to actually get things done, as long as it's reflective of what we see in the committee. If we wind up going into a three-and-three situation, I don't see it being productive. There is really no point in having a subcommittee at that point.
Surely, as I would have to communicate with a larger number of members on our side who are not going to be in that subcommittee meeting, you could do the same thing. Obviously the Liberals don't have the same problem.