First of all, there is a generic recommendation on the need for better coordination of the variety of federal programs aimed at supporting industry, especially research and development. There is a requirement for some way to structure these programs to make them more effective in their dealings with industry. That's number one. We very much support that. We are adding to that recommendation the need for the structures to become flexible. They need to be adjustable, depending on their performance and the changes in the market. Creating legislation for new structures that doesn't allow them to change in the next 50 years is not going to be helpful, because the global market is changing much faster.
Second, all of these organizations and programs should be accountable, and the accountability should be based on industry-value methods. Rather than judging government officials on how many companies they meet in a year, it's important to judge the effectiveness of the programs they have managed for those companies. Has the return on investment increased? Are those companies becoming more viable as a business—not next year, but three to five years afterwards? This is the time that counts in the life of a business.