Yes, this is a good point.
Back in 2008, we were dealing with the AWS spectrum, so it was less scarce than the 700 megahertz spectrum. It was decided at the time to make a set-aside so that new entrants could come in. Today we have new players such as WIND, Public, Mobilicity, Vidéotron, and there are now one million subscribers with these new entrants. There was another market created. You can find a package for a very low price—something like $15, $20 a month—and after that the incumbents went with packages other than those they usually carry, just to have competition.
The stats show that average prices went down over 10% since 2008, so this was the right thing to do. However, since we are going once again with the spectrum auction, there was a matter of access to capital, so it was time to lift the restrictions.
Given that we are dealing with a scarce spectrum, the 700 megahertz one, making a set-aside was very dangerous for the government because we could not choose which block would be set aside. As a result, we decided to go with the less intrusive approach, to go with caps. After that the prime block will be available for new entrants and will be dealt by the market. Depending on which block you deal with, it has an impact on the ecosystem, the devices, and there is a lot of complexity and technical stuff.
We decided that the wise approach would be to let the market go. This is a balanced approach, a whole bunch of tools to make sure that we can achieve these goals. If you speak of tower-sharing, roaming, spectrum, or access to capital, you cover basically all.