I guess her company is related to my question because you mentioned in your opening remarks a company that I believe you said was saved by FedDev support, and her company, she says, was saved by SR and ED credits.
There are two different ways to save companies and so the question goes back to efficacy. What is the relative efficacy of program spending, where a government program or agency decides how to spend the money, versus a tax credit where you're just letting companies do what they want to do?
I understand that you're developing metrics. Will you be soliciting input from Parliament on the metrics and the methodology? We're going to be using those metrics to formulate policy.