There are a number of ways to do it. We've looked at the legislation around the world. New Zealand's legislation, for example, has the concept of an authorized circumventor, which essentially defines a situation in which circumvention is allowed.
Within our own act there is an investigative exemption, and we think that if the investigative exemption were modified to include investigating breaches of all laws and international IP treaties as well, that could also be a focus of it.
In our mind, it's really more the intent of breaching the TPMs than the act itself. Obviously, breaching a TPM for the purpose of infringing the copyright should be a breach of the law and be heavily prosecuted. But we believe that under the fair dealings provision, you should be allowed to circumvent any provision in order to investigate breaches of personal rights.
So it's a questsion of the circumstances under which you would actually investigate.