I understand that. I'm asking because we have heard already from many witnesses at the committee that in many cases the United States, or in other cases Europe, is the point of primary filing because that's where the markets are.
We've mentioned that Canada is a very small part of the market, so I'm not sure how much adding this in Canada would result in more primary rather than secondary filings. Often what businesses are doing is filing in the U.S., where the large share of the market is going to be. They can make use of that provision, and then they make their secondary filing in Canada when the product is further along the development line.
I'm just not sure how one would actually help the other.