Okay, thank you.
I have a second question.
Ms. Garland suggested that we move more towards the U.S. patent model. However, we've been hearing through testimony a bit of contradictory evidence. One of your colleagues, Mr. Scott Inwood from Waterloo, mentioned that there's quite a few murmurings in the U.S. about whether the Bayh-Dole act has outlived its purpose and about perhaps looking at moving towards more of a Canadian system.
Sylvain Laporte, the CEO of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office, said here that Canada has a number of aspects in our current patent system that they're aspiring to.
They're perhaps moving the changes in the American investment act more to a Canadian model of investing. It seems to be a bizarre situation if we're moving closer to the U.S. model and they're moving closer to ours, and we just switch positions.
Maybe you could help me understand that a bit more.