Thank you very much.
I think I've largely addressed everything that came up.
Just to follow up on Mr. Regan's second question, in terms of an IP crime task force, that is something we feel would be extremely helpful. As I said, there's an informal working group right now in which we do informal information exchanges with law enforcement. Having something that's more formal, that's more organized, that actually has a broader range of participation from various government departments would be extremely helpful, as would developing educational strategies.
Right now we have the Canadian Intellectual Property Office. It is mandated to educate the Canadian population about IP. It does have some programs in place, but the issue is whether or not those programs are sufficiently robust. Are they actually educating the population and small enterprises in the way they should be? How does that link with IP crime? When people think of patents and wonder if, as a start-up, they should patent something, they're not thinking about the IP crime element. It all interlinks. You can't separate them. To ensure that we're properly educating people about those and about the way all of these issues connect together is critically important.