There's only the possibility of giving you a subjective answer to that question, but if I had to come down on one side or the other, I would say no, we're not.
That being said, in the country we're doing a lot better than we have been doing in the past. We can all point with pride to Waterloo as an example of experiential-based learning that clearly has an effect on the approach graduates take coming out of there. There's more willingness by Waterloo graduates to start companies than there is by people who haven't worked in small entrepreneurial companies throughout their undergraduate education.
Lots of other things are being done in other parts of the country, but predominantly, I think no, we're not where we need to be. Waterloo could be an example for more of that to take place across the country.
There are lots of other experiential-based learning programs now, and that's good. There are what universities call capstone projects, projects in which fourth-year students work with industry. There are things like that. There are many programs that graduate studies schools are doing to encourage people doing graduate work to consider entrepreneurship as a career, as opposed to thinking they will be academics, because most won't be, so that's all improving.
You see it in the aggregate numbers. I spoke about some of them in terms of start-ups created by universities. They're pretty good in Canada. The numbers are very good, in fact. We don't give ourselves enough credit for that.
But can we do better? Absolutely, we can do better there.