First of all, I will say just as a preamble that the comment about Atomic Energy of Canada Limited being an example of the kind of thing we have to do in Canada is probably not a bad example. It was very mission-oriented. It led to exactly what you were talking about, from an idea to the commercial marketplace. We need to do more of that in Canada. I think it's very important.
As you know, the reactor and Atomic Energy of Canada now report through the Natural Resources Canada file, not me, obviously. The neutron scattering activity is a relatively small component that they were going to abandon some years ago, but through a cobbling together of various funding sources it was retained.
More recently, NSERC, which is the predominant funder of that activity, gave notice that it would be pulling back from continuing to do so, which makes it somewhat, shall we say, at risk. The largest amount of funding was coming through them to academic researchers, who are the predominant users.
There are instances where there have been exceptional outside users, but they're very few in number. When they do occur, they're very significant. The challenge that AECL and Chalk River labs are dealing with right now is whether or not that's a capacity they should be trying to maintain.