Well, they're going to go where the money is. When the current wireless providers in previous auctions bought up areas that were partially urban and partially rural, they ignored the rural because there wasn't a big enough customer base; they go where the money is. Certainly, providing that incentive for them to actually service the rural areas is critical.
With regard to Madam LeBlanc's questions earlier, you mentioned having to go back to your members to ask them what they would think about using some of the money gained from the wireless spectrum auction to actually reinvest in some of that infrastructure. I think we'd be very interested in hearing back from the chamber on that question after you've had a chance to go back to your members. They could certainly help, but perhaps not necessarily for this study, to guide us down the road.
In regard to rural business, I know that the chamber—in your top 10—has some serious concerns within the tourism industry. Much tourism happens in rural areas. Are there any points you'd like to add that are specifically relevant to this study on how tourism industries could be helped by enhanced connectivity or other efforts?