On the FCM protocol, what we established was a better way to cooperate. That way, municipalities in Canada can indicate to carriers their preferences, where they would like to see antennas go up, or sites go up, what type of look they want, if they want camouflage on it or different designs—they can set those preferences. We feel it should not be one-size-fits-all because different municipalities may have different objectives.
In some large municipalities you actually still have agricultural zones, for instance. In some places they may not mind if you set up antennas in agricultural zones, while other municipalities will say no.
The protocol that's been established is a tool for a municipality to tell the industry what their preferences are and how they are going to work together. It enhances the cooperation and collaboration between the wireless industry and local land-use authorities and municipalities. We think this will solve most of the problems, but I don't believe it will solve all the problems. There will always be some issues in some places.
The key to keep in mind is that when we look at data consumption and we talk about data consumption going up, a lot of that data is now being consumed in the home, even on the wireless mobile devices. Up to 40% of data is consumed in the home on mobile devices. So for that reason we need sites closer to where people live.