As I mentioned off the top, my focus is largely on the policy side. Certainly some of the things that were in, let's say, the throne speech I think are important. Last time round, anti-spam legislation was passed, which is currently going through the regulations phase. I think it's worth noting that a number of groups were perhaps not paying enough attention back when that bill was being passed, and they're seeking to use the regulation-making phase to undo the kind of structure the government put in place. I think it did a good job on that front.
I think the reintroduction of the privacy legislation is another example of a very positive step forward.
Even with regard to copyright, which I spent a lot of time talking about, I think there are a lot of good things in that bill that will help develop some of the things we're talking about. As I mentioned off the top, though, the digital lock rules aren't among them. In fact it's worth distinguishing between providing flexibility through fair dealing, with such things as a fair use provision, and implementing digital lock rules, for which there is no legal risk at the moment. The fair use provision presents a legal risk for companies in Canada, though not for those in the United States. If you implement digital lock rules, all we're talking about is a potential business risk. I think there's a pretty significant difference between what will be facilitated through creating more flexibility versus moving more towards the lock approach.