That was my understanding as well. I asked the question because in 2008-09 we had the then minister of industry, Tony Clement, after the deals to reject the takeover of potash and MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates came out and said there needed to be a thorough review of the act. But recently we've heard time and time again from the government that those six provisions are enough, even though they haven't been changed, and yet ministers on successive occasions have said, in fact, it wasn't enough and there needed to be a review.
“Exceptional basis” that the Prime Minister put into the lingo in December was specifically for oil sands development. Is that correct?