Yes, I think it's the United States, the U.K., China, Japan, and Germany that would have reviews that would be triggered by an actually defined term of national security.
What I'm wondering is whether at Industry Canada you're aware of any studies in the Canadian context. As you've said, think tanks have recommended this. It's in the Canada Gazette, from when the 2009 amendments were accepted, that there were recommendations at the time that the term “national security” should be “explicitly defined and national security reviews should take place according to concrete, objective, and transparent criteria”.
Are you aware of any empirically designed studies that would in any way question the benefit of having such defined terms and such transparent reviews?