In terms of the potash one that was mentioned earlier in discussion, a section 23 notice was sent by then Minister Clement to the investor advising them that they had a 30-day period within which they could make.... He was basically signalling that he wasn't convinced it was of net benefit, but he provided them with a 30-day window during which they could make representations and change his decision. They elected to withdraw the transaction during that period. So it's incorrect to say it was rejected.
On May 21st, 2013. See this statement in context.