Not as yet; these are very large micro-data sets, at the individual firm level, and it's going to require some time for researchers to use those very large data sets to tease out what the results are.
But they do give us far better measures. We didn't have very good measures, especially at the firm level, of software and of other... what we call intangible assets—capitalized labour—in designing IT systems, which we now have from tax files. It has taken years to work out the protocols whereby researchers can access these files without any way of understanding who or what that firm is.
I think that over the next year you'll see these coming out. As I said, this new paper came out from Stats Can today looking at intangibles; it's by John Baldwin. He said that it does not solve the problem of why we have this productivity gap.
We have to look at the firm level. The national level simply doesn't work. We have to get into the underpinnings of what this dilemma is and the use of ICT in Canadian businesses, both small and large. The data suggest that the multinationals do a much better job of integrating ICT and getting productivity enhancements into domestic firms, and we don't know what the reasons are.