In this regard, building on what the minister has said, again, this change was done in the context of trying to modernize the bill overall.
Specifically with respect to the word “distinctiveness”, really this involves a change from “wares” to “goods”, and trying to ensure that the definition means “inherently capable of distinguishing”, which I gather from a technical perspective is not the case now.
Paul can help me out, but in terms of the industry's concern, we have heard from only one stakeholder, so we're taking that into account.