Sorry, I'm so limited in time, I have to interrupt you.
I'm concerned about the declaration of use provision. As my colleague across the way has said, the legal community has raised this as a concern. Why make this change if it's not essential to these treaties? Our understanding is that experts agree that trademark use is one of the basic principles of the Trade-marks Act, and that rights ensue from the use of a trademark.
We have a Supreme Court of Canada ruling on this, the Masterpiece ruling.
If Bill C-31 becomes law, in your view, could it become a constitutional challenge by the provinces?