One second, Mr. Halucha. I appreciate your answer, but I am a bit curious about something.
In his book, titled Intellectual Property Law, Professor David Vaver states that a trademark has no value if it's not being used. I can't understand why continued use of a trademark is contrary to the international agreements we have signed. That is perfectly acceptable. I see no issue there. I don't think that you have demonstrated that continued use of a trademark—to ensure that it is not monopolized or being used inappropriately—is contrary to those agreements.