Thank you.
I think I would just add that we're living with the learnings of the 2008 spectrum auction, in which the regulator recognized the need to have these measures to promote competition, and these specific measures were the mandated roaming and the mandated tower-sharing. There was a learning experience with that and realizations that the process didn't necessarily move quick enough to let the new entrants realize their full potential. We did see a positive pricing, though, in the markets where there were the fourth players, in fact, and this isn't just about cost and low cost necessarily. It's about removing the barriers to entry so that these more innovative players and the regionals as well can add that competitive fourth that the incumbents respond to.
So I say the evidence shows that there was better pricing in those fourth markets, and I'll just end with that. When you saw the new entrants enter, you saw them offering unlimited talk and text plans. You saw the big three react with flanker brands and also similar offerings. So that's evidence that it's not just about cost; it's about competitive choices.