The deferral accounts is a nasty episode in CRTC history. I would hope that the CRTC would design it so that kind of gaming could not take place. It's often a “use it or lose it” kind of rule so that if someone does not get something ruled out in the area they promised, it goes back to tender, if you will. That's one mechanism.
Just keeping on top of them with targets, which I think the CRTC is starting to do now but maybe left for a couple of years, for the deferral accounts is another method. I can probably think of more if I had a little more time, but that's my best answer.