I just want to say I appreciate the concerns that have been raised. As the official opposition you're doing your job and being a megaphone for the concerns that have been raised, but frankly we don't agree. These are IP treaties that make perfect sense, and I can understand why some, particularly the Canadian Bar Association, aren't terribly big fans of this.
By the way, there's a reason why these protocols are also consolidated in our Digital Canada 150 plan, because if you're a Canadian innovator and you want to get a patent and you have to hire a patent lawyer and it costs between $3,500 and $5,000 to secure a patent for your idea, you want to make sure a patent troll doesn't sit on your idea and steal it, because information is instantly global.
If you file a patent in Canada, we want it to be protected around the world. Patent lawyers who can charge you $3,500 to register a patent in every country in the world are going to be upset, but guess who benefits? Small businesses that have to register patents and protect their IP are going to benefit greatly from these reforms. The idea here, of course, is very simple, which is why all other countries that are signatories have ratified these agreements. They're ahead of the game. We're behind the game. We need to ratify these agreements, so Canadians whose livelihoods are dependent upon the protection of their intellectual property have the capacity to protect it internationally, and not make it impossible for them to protect themselves.
Colleagues, as Bill C-31 moves forward—and I guess it's considered over at the finance committee and not this committee—if the NDP has suggestions on how we might amend this, bring them forward. First, I think it's a pretty straightforward idea to protect Canadians' IP on an international level and not just domestic. Second, I think it's pretty easy to understand why those who are opposed to it are opposing it: their self-interest.